Showing posts with label Speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Speech. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Re: "Commentary" - How Stupid can Funnel and Channel get?

Again, the idiotically won't stop with these people.
But I like to say to all, that if you don't right anything back against trolls and cyberbullies like Channel or Funnel, that doesn't mean you lost.
No matter how delusional it comes to their minds claiming their trash has "owned" the victim (e.g. 'wwwarea')


An interesting journal article still stands due to them failing (and saying the same thing over and over again that's already been debunked).

Request Used
============================== 

Of course, while REM already lost and can't debunk me (Proven why) and the blind cyberbullies including LMJ (who also supports the guilt of slander) continue to be corrupted as usual, the bigot (can't tolerate other people's personal views with prejudice) FunnelDelusion continues to act as disrespectful, and idiotic as usual.
http://funnelvortex.deviantart.com/journal/commentary-wwwarea-and-the-Church-of-Sonic-571236491

Note: Of course, within quote spacing: The deeper quote spacing is his, the main quote spacing without the bold is mine and the bold messages in the quote spacing is his again (But recent).
Note again: Some of my own quotes he posted within the quotes pacing may have some bold stuff too.
Also, the deeper quote spacing with bold words are most likely Funnel's too.
Sorry that it took me a while to get around to doing this. It took me a while to get around to doing this because I actually have a life. Now moving on.
A classic internet troll who pretends his life counts and others don't.. and unaware of the fact that I don't always stay in this boring house.
I will still post the request, I still don't know about the taboo idea though.

Request Posted:


You think I do this for views?
And what is this whole "request" thing? I do not get it.
You don't get it. It's explaining that the more this blog is monitored by stalkers like you, the more views this blog is going to get. Keep them up!
I thought we already went through this (The request thing).
I do not act like a fucking psychopath. Lot's of people who question popular beliefs are not psychopaths.
Oh the emotions of your bigotry cannot stand it.
Yet, regardless, you have no right to slander me.

There is questioning popular belief based on a solid basis, and then there is questioning a popular belief just for the sake of questioning a popular belief with no other goal other than just trying to be some big rebel.
No their isn't. Everyone has a reason and I already told you, I do this for the sake of promoting more possibilities, against discrimination with actual reasoning, etc.



Yeah it's called disagreeing and giving criticism back.

What does that have to do with it?
The thing you called "made up" was that.
Yeah right.

Well its true. 
And you need to be aware that you are not right about me.. At all.
Example: You are not right about me being "delusional" because you don't have proof that 'my claims' are 100% wrong.
*Drinks* <The 'depend on popularity' beer

Seriously? 
I don't know if you did it too, but I think I was inspired by REM who failed to argue the comparisons and posted a *drinks* thing because I used a word to compare.
Though on my side, I actually argue why you were wrong too.
And how do you know that?
Because depending what other people FEEL about me is NOT a valid excuse to argue that I'm "guilty".

Alright. When you end up facing a judge and jury in court, tell them what you just said. They will not give a fuck because what the judge and jury thinks of you will be what determines whether you are guilty or not. If your peers are displeased with you, then you most likely are guilty.
Umm they should follow the laws, and not depend on feeling.
I admit some laws are unconstitutionally passed based off feeling and I think people should abolish them.
Also, I am not guilty for what I defend with my opinion. It's not against the law to believe in change.
No it's not. Kissing in movies has annoyed a lot of people off, does that make it wrong?

I do not know anyone who is annoyed by kissing in movies unless it is poorly-written.
Asexuals, people like me, heterosexuals in some situations, homosexuals in some situations, and maybe more.
Oh and people who just wants to see action.

You are the one looping in a circle forcing me to repeat myself.
Umm I'm actually not. You are the one repeating the same exact thing based off your overly emotional popularity bullshit.

You are the one who keeps responding with the same exact responses.
No. It's you. Sometimes though I may NEED to say some stuff that is the same because they still argue further than your repeating arguments or other styles that still couldn't debunk it.
Such as proving a law to you that you KEEP fucking denying.
And Sonic never had quality to begin with then.

Well Sonic did have quality from Sonic 3 through Unleashed, discounting the mid-90's games like 3D Blast and Labyrinth. And there was Chronicles and 06 which really sucked as well. But other than those hiccups Sonic was pretty good through that time period until Lost World and Boom happened.
And Alpha and Omega had a lot of quality with the graphics, the smooth animation, and some effects.
A creative story as wolves, and new ways that never happened.
Unique designs rather than generic realism wolves.
Pretty good.
If you say it's not, then I will say your reasoning is not good either then.
Yet, you are wrong (Because again, you force your hate at me for expressing my own likes for a picture), it had enough quality for a general amount of people.

I am not hating you for liking Alpha and Omega. I just said I thought the picture was creepy.
Said the guy who said the movie was bad, etc. under some part involving that.
 Yet, you didn't need to say that (The "creepy" thing), you could of kept that to yourself.
Just because you think it's "obvious" doesn't mean you are right.
Sock accounts?

No, it doesn't mean I am right. But it raises the chances that I might be right.
Just like anything. If you know you are not 100% sure, then don't act like you are 100% sure.
And your past doesn't connect to this.

I wouldn't have credibility without experience. 
 What?
A past is a past. I am already over the Sonic.EXE thing and you still bring it up and try to connect to it.
Yeah, on Tumblr. Which would be the perfect site for you!
Actually, why won't you just move to Tumblr? You would be at home with all the other SJWs, Otherkin, and special snowflakes who run rampant on that site.
 Oh stop being a baby. Maybe SOME Tumblr stuff is right then? Such as the 'Be yourself' stuff, etc.
Stop being a fucking dick, you fucking asshole.

Yep. Tumblr is totally fine! Except for the sad special snowflakes and the Social Justice Warriors who bully people for not agreeing with their views. Hell, the SJWs bullied someone near the point of suicide because she drew Stephen Universe characters in a certain way. 
And a lot of the people who engage in this behavior are otherkin, misanthropes, SJWs, and things of the like. 

I am more than sure that wwwarea will attempt to take the above statement I just made and turn it around on me telling me why I am some hypocrite. But before he does, let me get this clear:
I do not like A&O's art style. But I do not bully people over it.
I do not advocate bullying or suicide, but the kinds of people who did this to the SU artist are the kinds of people wwwarea supports!
Again, when I say that some stuff from 'Tumblr' is right that doesn't mean I am saying everyone there is right. It's like you forgot what I said on some parts.
And where is the proof actually? Just because ONE otherkin or ONE misanthrope did that, doesn't mean I am the same (And I don't think I am exactly an Otherkin). Discriminating someone based off what they like, doesn't make you any better than someone who bullies someone for drawing a character in a certain way.

I need to study for your first claim.
But you DO advocate bullying at least.
And you ALSO advocate slander.

If I had to say who belongs in the list of bad otherkinds, misanthropics, etc. you are one of the bad sonic fans (I couldn't think of something in general, sorry) who advocates bullying, (E.g. mock, and some other) and you promote slander.
Maybe you should move their for your shitty Sonic OC garbage then.

Nah, DA is half Sonic art so I have no reason to move to Tumblr from DA just to be with other Sonic artists. I haven't drawn Sonic in a long time, actually.
And DA is half fighting (Honestly...)
And neither do I have a reason to move there, since it has a lot of stuff I like too.
And for your shitty spiritual beliefs then, etc.

At least I am rational and behave reasonable with mine. 
 No you don't. You attack other people for having different spiritual beliefs than you.

Plus, I am reasonable with mine too with the evidence you always claim to be "pseudoscience" just because you want to.
I'll say your spiritual beliefs are 'pseudoscience' because I said so then.
Oh rly?
Stop talking like a 13 year old.

Acting like a 13 year old? No no no. Constantly swearing and spamming memes is acting like a 13 year old. I am just telling it how it is.
Adults swear all the time.
Spamming memes, I know someone who keeps spamming immature Death Battles and I know a someone (Channel) who sometimes post memes.
 Again, making up excuses for him to start fights with me.
I'm not making up bullshit, and he has no right to stalk me just because you and him finds a standing up for themselves person's speech "bullshit".

How are we inflicting your free speech? Don't you know someone is going to disagree when you say something?
It really depends on how people disagree.
You can disagree, but if you go out with it, this is where it all depends.
Disagreeing is no excuse to bully those (e.g.) for their fetishes.
 All I did was posted another comment complaining about you censoring me.
And because of you, censoring me and the topics around the game which caught my interest.

I did not "censor" anyone. I was trying to make you shut up, because you would not shut up throwing a huge fit over something you don't even care about!
"I didn't censor you! *Censors/Hides Comment*" <You
Are you saying it's bad to get that? And no I don't have that.

So you do not even have THAT?
Just because I don't have that, doesn't mean I have a worse job.
If it's stalking, and forcing people to change without consent, then that's bullying.

We are not forcing you to change without your consent. The only one who can change you is yourself.
No, you are pressuring people to change (It's basically the same as forcing). That's another form of bullying.
It's like if you complained at me for not personally liking Sonic, and I avoided it, then you made people attack me for it, and acted like I was "bad" for that, then that's kind of forcing. No, I'm not saying you did that, but it's an example.

And no, I'm not forcing myself to change. That is literally insanely non-sense.
How far can victim blaming get?
Educated assumptions are.
"educated assumption"?
*Facepalm*

It's true you know.
 No, it's not. That's just something you made up to make yourself look different from 'assumption'.
Assumption, is not and will never be concrete.
Umm what? I go against them because an overly emotional society doing that to subjects promotes harm, and more discrimination, and other bullshit. That's a reason why I love to question taboos.

Meanwhile the same society elected a black president and legalized gay marriage.
Just because society got better with some stuff, doesn't mean they are perfect.
Plus the fun of exposing how stupid humanity in general has gotten.

Actually humanity is getting smarter. www.bbc.com/news/magazine-3155…
Just because they are clever at some stuff, doesn't mean they are smart.
You can be clever and still stupid about random subjects.
So stop straw picking or whatever that means.

If they were smarter, then we wouldn't have any discrimination, tabooing, tolerance for people being as "weird" as possible, and some more.

And judging by some stuff I've seen too, we in general are still stupid.

Oh and also: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-25/dumb-dumber-scientific-proof-people-are-getting-stupider
And in case you do not click on the link, here is one thing from it:













Actually it does? Because of the reasons.
Stop dictating other people not you.
I am for revolutionary (Hmm, I wonder where you hea... eh, nvm). I believe we should address the overly emotional things that lacks any scientific result to keep something 'forbidden'.

Science is only one field. There is also sociology, philosophy, theology, politics, idealism, etc. Not everything can be answered by scientific means.  
Not exactly true. A lot of the time, they connect.
Plus scientific is supposed to be concrete results, etc. Which is more superior than a non-concrete result.
Example: The science shows how many there is, the history, etc.
That's superior than someone saying "No it's not!" because of so.
What? Face it, the research was very much better than overly emotional people who censors the scientific results, the open mind, the curiosity, and some other and freaks out over open discussion, etc.

 Where did you get this idea from? While scientists do take shit from the religious right, there is nothing stopping them from making their findings public.
No, a lot of overly emotional people try to keep things forbidden, makes it hard for other people to open. Plus some direct censorship exist.
And "probably" is just your emotional opinion without any real concrete evidence as usual.

No, "probably" just means sometimes it can be true. But most of the time it isn't. 
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/probably
It's a non-concrete assumption. Probably has a possible CHANCE, but it's not 100% certain and can possibly be wrong. Science can possibly answer which side is correct on a subject.
Again, an overly emotional feeling.
Plus, consenting is the only moral thing.
Rape is unwanted sex. Plus, I am pretty sure they know what is happening. Plus the term "perverted" is just an opinion.

They have no idea what they are being fucked by. And perverted is not an opinion.
Pretty sure they do.
And perverted IS an opinion. The term "perverted" is made up by some humans who has a unscientific opinion about people's likes and calls any other likes a weird made up term.

It's like calling petting "petveriliskj" and that if the pets don't know that new made up term (Like how perverted is made up), then it's automatically "bad" now?

Yet again, if they enjoy something, nobody is hurt. or even raped (And as long if consent is involved in the first place).
I can find a VERY good article to show why the arguments are wrong, because I believed it addressed many things, but alas, what's the point? You won't read it.

It will probably be from some furry site anyways.
Again, depending on 'where' and 'who'? This is why you are still not good at arguing.
You seem to think that a very good article is "false" JUST because of where it came from?
This is why humanity in general is getting more dumb.
Guess what? I don't do that crap. Even if a good article was from a horrid guy who supported rape of humans, I would still ONLY depend on the article regardless of who, where, why, when, and maybe others.
Plus, do animals consent to being killed?
Do animals know why people 'owned them'.
Do animals consent to being trapped in a house?
Do animals consent to being used for meat?
Do animals consent to being moved to other places by forced?

They can't consent, they are simply not capable. And many animals are bred specifically for those purposes. 
 Actually they can consent. Consenting is about behavior, and action. You do not need to know English and write papers. If consent didn't exist, then non-human animals wouldn't exist.
And if they can't consent to anything, then everything should be illegal with a non-human animal.. if they somehow exist.

Yet, if it's legal to kill them for meet, then even actual rape of non-human animals (That even I am against) should be legal then.
Umm, no, I'm not.
Let me give you an example: In the report, if a human didn't do a thing and the other did it, how did the human "raped" it?
I know it sounds like I am one of those guys by some, but I'm still on this subject because of me being very angered with stupidity.

Then it is still rape.
Umm no it's not.
That is hilariously ridiculous.
I had a comic in an idea that a human was raped by a horse, (or whatever) then the police came and the guy explained the horse forced him to have sex, then the police arrested the men for.... "raping" the horse?

I'm sorry but if I had to depend on the evidence, the human didn't rape the horse. It was the horse that raped the human. (Or if the human wanted it, nobody is raped)
Just because you think it is, doesn't mean you are right.

Rape is UNWANTED, and an animal literally wanting to do that and doing it by force, is not rape.

People like you are the reason why humanity in general is getting very stupid. How emotionally idiotic people like you are becoming.

Of course, SOME humans are smart though.
 Killing an animal is wrong though. PETA being against that it's self is a good thing, though at the same time PETA kills animals too. So nope!

So you are one of those animal rights/anti-hunting douchebags.
And you are one of those anti-rape douchbags then.. Considering killing an animal without consent is worse than actual proven rape.

Again, exposed to how stupidity it is, and worse, you support violating the natural right of an animal and consider GOOD things as "bad".
If animals don't have rights, then humans don't have rights.
And you know what else people freak out over of things they do not like?
Humans murdering other humans, abusing animals, etc.

Because murdering other humans is murder.
Again, you expose your hypocrisy of you freaking out about people freaking about things they don't like.
What you do, is something wrong, and fairly unlikable like murder.
It's an overly emotional reason filled with prejudice, bigotry, and other hate. That's it.
Actually a healthy society wouldn't make things taboo. And wow, you don't even believe in Polygamy rights either? WTF.
 Again, your reasoning is bullshit. Just because things are considered "downhill" doesn't mean it's a good reason to keep things a taboo.
Again, your reasoning for that is based off prejudice, and bigotry, and other hate.

So basically your idea of a healthy society is anarchy?
 No, it's real healthy. The only anarchy is tabooing consenting things out of pure belief.
Why things are a taboo is due to either religious beliefs, random whiny opinions, etc.
It's all an unhealthy belief that is forced upon others for consenting in privacy.

And if you can't respect consenting things (e.g. Polygamy) then people won't respect you.
And shows how unhealthy you are obsessing with things consenting in private.
You also want to know something? It's been viewed on homosexuality too in the same exact way.

Knew you would draw that comparison.
But it's fair.
And we need to make other things less taboo too.
It's not over you know.

:shrek: It's not ogre! It's never ogre!:shrek: 
Real mature.
There is still problems with bigots who is against consenting things such as Polygamy and a few other things, etc.
A good an developing society wouldn't forbid freedom within individual privacy.

Are you referring to sexual activities? 
Anything consenting, or alone.
While Polygamy is more of a marriage thing, it can suggest that too as long if no other Freedom of another is violated..
(Polygamy laws violate freedom though)
In the end, this is why I question taboos, and why I think making stuff a taboo is just wrong.
The reasoning why stuff is taboo is all based off prejudice and random other beliefs.
Your explanation didn't explain why they were taboo in the first place.

I actually explained it pretty well.
All you did was explain why it was still a taboo, and it was a stupid reason.
You didn't explain why they were taboo in the first place. 
Umm, no.
You are confusing action with personality.
Having a vore identity for your main orientation is not the same thing as taking an action.

Vore identity? What the hell is that? There is a vore fetish, but there is no vore "orientation". 
How do you know? No really!
Actually I mean it's part of your main orientation..
Plus, I think the term 'orientation' is just a bunch of bullshit it's self.

Everyone could be born an asexual.

Christianity isn't the only God worshipping. (Or your personal made up opinion God)
Plus, it was a part guess. Don't forget about your own "normal" religion.

At least I do not think I created the universe with my brain.
Again, you don't have proof that you are right.
While 'Normal' is already debunked, there is evidence that mind is over matter. And a recent experiment with atoms proving the theory of that.

The line is not imaginary in that sense. 
It is. Just because you said so, doesn't mean it exist on people not you.

The line always existed.
No it didn't.
The Golden Rule is about not interfering with other people. Following that is always a must.

Even if they can turn into PaulandAmy
PaulandAmy has interfered with people. Different.

No I do so for the sake of protecting freedom, etc.

And what are you going to do for it?
To protect individual freedom at least.
It's like fighting for your own country.
A moral tolerance is about accepting those for who they are and what they personally like to express.
Just because a popular cult believes that it's "not normal" doesn't mean it exist.
That's like saying a certain other fictional character exist on this world because many kids believe so.

Isn't that what you believe in? You think there are an infinite number of realities created by our quantum vibratory mind powers. Then wouldn't it be true, according to you, that the millions of kids who believe in Santa would eventually conjure up Santa?
No. Not on this world.
I am not sure if the multiverse is the same, it's also might of been said that when 'You' create reality, you are going into other parallel universes. Then again, yes it could be created by 'our quantum vibratory powers'.
I also believe in 'Oneness', and 'everything is Oneness'.. I mean I am not sure about it, but that's a theory.

Actually that doesn't exactly works.
There is the theory that if 'everyone' believed, it would happen, but I am more into the theory of two kinds:
1. 'You' create all the events too, including people.
2. Each person does, but each one goes into their own parallel reality.

I don't care if you think it's crazy it's self, but that's what interesting theories 'are' about.
 But it doesn't violate the PG thing, and yet, that's just your opinion. It's still a tamed down thing like kissing. And guess what? It is sexy for those who likes it. It's not your sexuality.

It's a fetish. Not a sexuality.
No, it's a sexuality. Just like Kissing. Kissing is a sexual idenity, and so is a "fetish".
Even Psychology Today believes it's a sexual identity.

And regardless, it's still nothing more extreme than kissing.
Oh and why did you say that 'Vore can be sexualized" if you think it's not a sexual thing?
Plus, if it's "not" sexual, then I guess all types "fetishes" can just go to G-rated then!

Yet, the term "fetish" is a stupid term to describe people being different.
Fetishes don't exist, the other things are just different ways of sexual identity.
Plus the term "fetish" has went way too far that it got way 'overused' too.
Also kissing can apply to anthropomorphic creatures too.

Yeah. And?
You said 'Kissing' means two humans.. So I put that there. :|

 Whatever you say. You don't know that..
Same with kissing. Yet, just because it's 'sexualized', still doesn't change the content it's self. It's just an erotic tamed down kissing style then when it comes to tamed down versions.
And some people will find kissing gross.
But just because some people find it gross, doesn't mean it's more extreme than kissing all of a sudden.

If you say it's "more gross" then KISSING is more gross than what I like then.

How is vore the equivalent to kissing?
It's like you ignored what you quoted when you said that...
Plus, hugging isn't exactly equal, but they are both tamed down and not pass the PG-rated (Unless maybe that even depends...)
Again, vore can be tamed down, and not past 'extreme content'. Regardless of the idea.
 It's a fantasy. That's different.
Plus, I'm talking about the content it's self.
My point is that in terms of 'what is"gross", a tamed down vore is no more extreme than kissing.
The IDEA for them may be different, but it's still not more extreme than seeing too people kiss.

So eating someone is the same as kissing.

Hmmm, why do you refer to vore so much? Are you a voraphile?
No (maybe), it's the same in terms of content, and 'how gross feeling' it is.
Besides, some find kissing humans more personally gross than humans.

Maybe it's because it's been talked a lot and the fact that it's a very understanding natural idea to a lot of people? And how some people compare 'vore' to very "extreme" things such as 'scat', and maybe some others.
Come on, vore has been shown on TV, and it doesn't matter of the idea, it's the content it's self that matters.

Let's say this was vore (It probably is):
http://thumb7.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/1096577/113670805/stock-vector-a-picture-of-humorous-a-wolf-and-a-rabbit-hare-looks-terrified-and-the-wolf-happy-upcoming-113670805.jpg
Now it's been made again, but with a 'sexual like' (e.g. Erotic?):
http://thumb7.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/1096577/113670805/stock-vector-a-picture-of-humorous-a-wolf-and-a-rabbit-hare-looks-terrified-and-the-wolf-happy-upcoming-113670805.jpg

OH NO. Different now.
*sarcasm*
No, it's the trolls and other types of cyberbullies fault that act that way to me, causing me to be concerned about them.

You do not have to respond you know.
Again, it's their fault. Sometimes responding is necessary.
Making a journal against me for expressing a natural open minded thing about spirituality starts a fight. And that's just one of many examples as to why you start fights.

Again, this started over the Sonic.exe thing.
No. That is an off-topic discussion.
 If it wasn't then that journal would of mentioned it. But it didn't.
I didn't make a rant against Alpha and Omega.
I made a rant to what is important for me to be happy in my own life, by bringing out the unfair arguments based off personality.

You rant against people who do not like it.
No. I rant against the CLAIMS regardless of whether they like it or not.
Even if they loved it, but still made up unfair claims, I would still rant probably.
Like if they think it "sucked" people of what "critics say" or something.
Umm so me giving you the correct link over and over again that still further debunks you makes it "wrong" all of a sudden now?
Plus, you spam that I "broke" the law without proof.

Most of the sites you cite are sites with an agenda.
You are just not making any sense anymore.
The law said it's not illegal. If that law said it's not illegal, it's not illegal.
Just like your ridiculous reasoning like "It'z fromz a furryz site, theorforz, wrong", depending on some off-topic thing, does not make you good in arguing.
Nope, not an illegal form.
Proof or its bullshit.

wwwarea's trump card.
"I will say it's illegal, even if the law said it's not or at least if I don't know for sure." <Funnel's trump card.
Just because it's different, doesn't mean it's wrong.
It doesn't need to be, people can have different ideas and beliefs under spirituality and it doesn't matter how many people think differently.
Oh yeah. *drinks*

So according to wwwarea, it is okay to think the world revolves around you!
Say that to a homosexual, black person, white person, etc. who thinks the world should be about acceptance then.
Again, just because they think different, doesn't mean they are right.
Again, moral arguments exist.
I am a victim though, and that you victim blame me and other is just wrong. It's not 'self-centered'.
That's the theory though. Just because you think it's "shitty" doesn't mean it is.
It's just an experiment. Maybe everyone in the world creates it at the same time.
Maybe you are in a dream creating it.
Or maybe everyone creates their own and each time they go, they go in a parallel universe creating other events, while I go to mine, creating more.

Sounds like what someone in a straitjacket would say.
Again, can't respect open theories. And can't even argue.
Maybe you need to be in one, including Peter.
Yet, a crazy person is someone who puts pain on others, not a spiritual fan who likes to accept 'new' views about life.
But the 'Big Bang' is still just a theory.
Or.. maybe the mind created the Big Bang!
Believe it or not, but even that can be a possibility. That our minds created our own history.
It may sound ridiculous to some, but that's what the theory is.
Beliefs create reality.

So let me get this straight. You think that we created the big bang, despite the fact there was nothing: no matter, energy, or consciousness before the big bang? So we were able to create the big bang with quantum vibratory mind powers even though we did not exist before the big bang. How the fuck does that work?!
And the big bang is still the best theory we have. The cosmic radiation background strongly supports it.
Actually there is evidence that stuff existed before the Big Bang. Some scientists believe that it was just another universe. Some also believe that we are inside a 'black hole', etc.
The point about 'consciousness' is that it was always there. Even some believe that our 'universe' was always there.
Like I said, the Big Bang and some ideas behind it of what you believe in, are still only a theory.

It could be a good theory, but you want to know what else is a good theory? The theory that stuff came before the Big Bang.
Hell, even some believe the the Universe goes in a major loop, swallowed by black holes, and recreated again.
It's fun when people are so open with theories, with another theory..
And if it is teaching something harmful and needs to be called out?
It's not harmful.
If it "is" because of your fear, then your spirituality is harmful then.

Teaching that the world revolves around you is harmful.
No, I mean morally arguing about morality and respect, is actually a good thing. It's against harmful things involving disrespecting other individuals. The only thing I am harming is the corrupted mentality that promotes unfair inequality, non-respect, and some other bad things.

It depends though, and it's not exactly "pulled out of ass", if it connects with possible legit theories (I.e. Attached with spiritual world creation, dreams in realities, mind over matter, etc) then it's less of an "ass" thing.

It can be if they have that attachment. According to what connects.
You can have a fucking "stupid" Angry Birds cult and have some belief about it like that, and I don't fucking care.. like how a good person who tries to move on would do.

Yet, if you believe you can turn into anything AFTER death, I see that even less crazy. And since it's not crazy to believe in reincarnations. <Folks, this is my argument.
And this is Funnel's:
So basically you think that it is totally reasonable to believe that you will turn into Sonic characters to bask in Sonic's glory after you die?
I better convert to the Church of Fast and start worshiping the fast SANIC hedgehog overlord now!

But seriously, if you have a religion based around Sonic and think you will turn into a Sonic character when you die then you have problems. Or you just like Sonic too much.
Because according to 'Mind over Matter', that the Spiritual World can be ANYTHING, and many other connections or so, it would be fair that someone can make up ... ANYTHING... and Sonic is part of that 'ANYTHING'. For logic, I had to say that as an example.

I fucking hate Sonic, but I still stand to my argument because it makes sense under the reasoning.
You seem to just attack it, and say "OMG, IT"Z SANIZ", as if that somehow "debunked" the reasoning.
Heaven is Heaven, you got to remember what that means.
OH NO! That means everyone else who likes Amy so much is automatically going to do the same thing!!!
*sarcasm*
You also want to know something?
Someone who was a heterosexual couldn't control his/her sexuality and raped someone in a house.

Potential threats are potential threats! :D

Plus in reality, it's not a 'potential' threat because it's not going to develop that for everyone else who loves Amy so much.


You don't get it. It started out as an obsession and it grew into something horrible.
Only for one or a couple of people.
Not going to be the case for all.
I don't know if I wish, but I kinda "wish" I can like Amy (But I just can't) to show you why it's possible that more 'Amy lovers' are not going to the same direction.
Just like heterosexuality.
Depending on who eh?
Plus, look at all the feedback.

 Yep. Really. Wonderful. Feedback
1. The first comment was probably giving an example of the actual rabid side.
2. One guy who can't argue, yet, someone already took care of it.
3. That has nothing to do with the subject directly.
4. Look at the favorites. And the OTHER comments that might make more sense.
But you said I threat to show the ADDRESS.
*Facepalm extreme*

You did.
Give me the snapshot. I am giving you permission of you to upload it on a private image site, only for the purpose of sharing it to me. Go again, comment on one of my blogs for that link.
I won't accuse you of harassment for this one because I am allowing just this.

Other than that, proof or it's bullshit.
I was offended because of your unfair censorship and with the reasoning around that game.

Why? It is a bad game and JC-The-Hyena is a dick.
In other words, "I censored wwwarea's comment because he disagreed with my opinion that it was a bad game!"
More like throwing away 35 bucks when I can just use a Creative Commons for free (maybe) to stop plagiarism.
I also requested Imgur to take down a Copyright picture (Without money) and they took it down.
Maybe I'll ask DA if I need money to take action with a DMCA.

Let me guess. It was a screenshot of your comments? 
Nah, it was like that grey guy face thing.
No. CC-0 does.
But Creative Commons main purpose is attribution.
Sounds like somebody doesn't know what Creative Commons is.

More like you don't because you only want what fits your view
My 'view' is based off learning about Creative Commons from the outside of my mind.
Just like with a lot of stuff.
It's you that do that. Creative Commons (Accept for CC-0) is NOT open source, it's about credit generally. Don't believe me? Look it up.
A stamp that has many links leading to articles. Yet, I am a person that counts.
Copyright is not a human right.
www.techdirt.com/articles/2012…

Once again an anti-copyright site.
Once again, depending on 'what' as if that was a "valid" argument to debunk the claim? This is why you shouldn't try to debate with people.

You: "Where is proof that 2+2=4?"
Me: Here, *Links to a furry site explaining why 2+2=4*
You: "That's a furry site."
Me: "So?"
You: "I'm going to ignore it and suggest it's false automatically because it's a furry site."
Me: *Facepalm*
I know you can't Copyright an idea (Though it's been argued that expression and ideas are the same) but it's still a monopoly, preventing people from using an existing thing to create more off of. It's also a monopoly preventing people to openly share.
Also, it's still considered (By man-made law) 'Copyright Infringement' to recreate something Copyrighted or to recreate something Copyrighted and use it for a later purpose.

Not how it works.
Yet it does.
Talk to that dumb ass Anne Rice who would sue others for making Fan Fiction, talk to Nintendo who takes down ROM hack videos via Copyright action, talk to thousands of other people with take downs against fans work that already credited, etc.
You clearly don't know what Copyright actually is and does.
It's a monopoly/permission culture (Permission culture was learned from Nina Paley), etc.
Also, here is a video about Nina Paley explaining Copyright again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO9FKQAxWZc
But you will probably ignore it JUST because Nina Paley is an anti-copyright activist.. Showing you just can't take the open fair criticism.
Example: You are still not allowed to draw Mickey Mouse and make up your own story without monopoly permission.
EVEN if you give credit.

That doesn't stop all the mickey mouse fanfic writers and fan artists out there!
So you admit that Copyright is a monopoly?
Just because it may not stop all doesn't mean it's not a monopoly anymore. It still is as it's still giving some writers legal "rights" to censor the expressions of them.
That stifles creativity and prevents Freedom of Expression.


No ir sowanr.
The hell?
Either way, an immature reply.
But seeing Copyright being used to stop Freedom of Expression and limit creative possibilities, it justifies my point.
Another thing about this article that owned Funnel, is that the person ignored the 'popularity' spelling part, and other parts.
:)

END

You did not own me.
Seeing the incredible amount of stupidity and non-sense from you, it did. And so did this article.

Not only you depend on popularity, but you also depend on 'where' and 'who'. You still don't understand Copyright, you are somewhat hypocritical, and maybe other problems.

That's why you lost.













End of Request


What "request?"
Again, we been over this didn't we?


--------------------------------

Well, that was wwwarea again.

Here I am signing off and reminding you all to pray to Sonic every night before bed!
And using that silly title (immature) shows why you can't understand the fair criticism and other people's reasoning.

This article owned Funnel despite what the stupidity of people said in those comments on DeviantART.

=======================
End.
Another comment to add, that "commentary" from Funnel literally is one of the most stupidest arguments I've seen.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Re: The Sadistic Never Ends

Again, the guy will keep spreading more insanity bigotry toward this guy.

We will just keep going.

Request Posted:
========================

Before I begin, I'd like to address something you all might be thinking, why am I continuing to make these responses? Well, I have three reasons. With every new response, he always brings up more reasons for people to go after him, I don't have any assignments or upcoming tests to work on yet, it's a Saturday and I have the rest of today, tomorrow, and Monday since I don't have class that day, and it's fun to see him try to justify every last fault he has. If this is starting to get grating, well, my apologies. Last note before I begin, I'll be trimming the entry I'm responding to.

Again, blaming the victim, and of course you promote the advocating harassment. Guess another one of those "If you don't stop, I will do this to you!!" and without any logical arguments, you depend on popularity all over again. Hell, it's not even that popular to what you do.
http://wwwarea.deviantart.com/art/Blame-the-Actual-People-570479331
Of course you don't.
Again, claiming I am "faults" because you said so I see.

 
You do know that those views could also be coming from trolls, curious individuals and EDiots, who all want to know more about your delusions, right? Trolls tend to subscribe/follow certain bad individuals to either laugh at their ineptitude or try to get more information.
Again, pretending I'm "delusional" when hiding the fact that it's only you that is delusional.
Either way, it's promoting the article to be more known and some good people may now be finding it again.
Besides, if this blog ever gets attacked by trolls, it shows how I am write that such a site (ED) promotes harassment and shows how harmful it is. (Prediction, "you made the trolls do this to youzzz".
Of course, the 24/7 stalker checks this wonderful truth seeking blog!

Question is, how do you know when a new response is made to one of yours? If I didn't know any better, I'd say you're a 24/7 stalker. But of course, you would try to find a way to justify that blatant fault. You always do.
That should apply to you buddy.
Actually, I barley check your profile compared to what you do.
And of course will defend every single bigoted corrupted non-sense.
Don't you do the exact same thing by justifying everything people call you out on? All because you can't stand to be wrong?
But I don't have bigoted or corrupted beliefs.
 And I'm not wrong.
It's like he's a kid and likes to say every single word against him because he hates it. He can't stand the truth!
What truth? You mean the truth that you basically prove that everyone's qualms against fetishes and Alpha and Omega were true? The truth that you're so lost in your delusional fantasy that you refuse to seek help? Honestly, I think it's you who can't stand the truth. You treat your views like fact, you use "The Golden Rule" and the first amendment as a get out of jail free card (not unlike those who use autism as an excuse), you make your own fandom look bad, you refuse to take an outside opinion that doesn't correlate with your own, you treat your views as fact (namely with Alpha and Omega), nobody outside of the fetishists you defend like you and you take the internet far too seriously, among other problems.
Yes because people's fetishes are often harmless, victimless, etc. And your bigotry mind can't seem to respect that. Not sure what you mean on A&O though, but it's a fact that intention purposes are flawless, and you can't just decide that someone's work that isn't yours to be a "flaw" because you said so.

Again, it's you that's lost in your delusional fantasy.

Face it buddy, you can't stand the real truth. Just because you think I am "wrong", etc. doesn't mean you are right.
You treat your views like fact (And they are not fact, and been proven wrong many times).

If you can't respect the Golden Rule, then you have lost all your morals. (And you already did)

I do not make my own fandom look bad, but you do make your sonic fandom look bad.

I sometimes listen to fair criticism, (You never do, and it still depends on what it is)

Maybe some views can have more evidence and fair points? That's the point of a debate. But you on the other hand treat YOUR views as "fact" without any good reasoning.

And you don't have a right to dictate with your ego mind of what I should and should not take involving the Internet.
So again, you lost.
Enough of the request BS. You are wwwarea, and before you try to deny it like always, this is a comment you posted on my Alpha and Omega review, and here's where you point out it's you (wwwarea), on the same comment no less. Who's the author of the blogs? Humphrey Omega. Who posted the comments I linked? Humphrey Omega (the same comments where you pointed out you were wwwarea). Try to defend that.
You do realize that I already admitted that the account used to be borrowed right? It's not. It was a friends account, and I decided to make my own somewhere else because I was sick borrowing it, plus me and my friend had a talk about it.
 Started at 8:14 PM (Or around 8:09 PM)
Man this guy loves to check my blog every day! This guy should go to prison for cyberbullying me every time I stand up for myself.

Bystander: Question, how do you know when the guy you obsess over makes a new response? Isn't that stalk-
wwwarea: NUUUUUU! REM's TEH DEVIL! AND IM A SYAINT! I DO NU WURNG!
The only reason why I'm writing these is because you keep writing them to me (and my friend sort of). You keep stalking me first, and always start fights with me.
All I'm doing is reacting to it.
Face it.
And you're not misreading the second sentence. He actually wants me to get sent to prison, all because I criticize him.
"Homosexuality is wrong because I said so! Let's mock and shame many people because.. It's criticism, therefor, I can't go to jail!"
Seriously man, how many times are you going to use the "it'z critizismz card"?
It's not an excuse, nor is it even valid.
Umm... actually it took 2-3 hours to make it.
I was referring to you taking 2-3 days to acknowledge the response before making a blog. If it sounded like I was saying something different, then I admit I was wrong.  Keep the last part of my sentence in mind, because it's something wwwarea could never do.
Actually I discovered it 2-3 days later.
Plus preparing is considered an important tip to actually write something.
Maybe it's because I'm not always wrong? Just because you wish I was, doesn't mean I was.
The other time I was *ahem* outside of my room, doing stuff.
Like what? Pigging out in the kitchen? Having a night of pleasure with Alpha and Omega in the living room? I need proof that you actually went outside and did stuff, because I'm not buying it.
And I need proof that you are right about me.
Just because you think I never went outside the house, doesn't mean you are right.
And what were you doing? Pleasuring off to your GF then?
I should be saying that to you.
You never were right no matter how much you believe.
And since when were you ever right?
Because I have evidence, real fair moral standers, etc. The stuff you do is frowned upon by real scientists, physiologists, etc..
Even some of the people who didn't like me admit you have done mistakes.
 The person never "owned" me. Stop pretending that kid was always "right" when it's nothing but overly emotional garbage.

Classic denial. You were doomed from the start.
Face it buddy. You can't just make bullshit up and pretend you are right. You need to have an understanding brain to even understand the BASIC form of what debating means.
But every time someone sends you criticism, you yell "Stop pretznting opiniozn are fazt" "He's delusional because I said so, right firneds? *right!* "Yeah, I am right now. Fuck the dictionary, fuck science, fuck other people, fuck morality of freedom, I rule."
That's what you are.
The more you keep acting like low emotional non-scientific opinions to be "right", the bigger the bigot you are.
Take the non out of non-science, and you'd get what wwwarea does on a frequent basis.
"Fuck science, and I will decide it's not science because I said so!"
Real mature.
Maybe you been jacking off to your disgusting heterosexual GF then... oh wait..
At least I'm working on finding a mate, unlike you. You've sealed your own fate as a virgin for life, thanks to your terrible personality and distorted views. Even Chris Chan lost his virginity.
I like how my guess was correct. And I thought you already had a GF one time? Gee, I wonder what happened.
No I didn't. There are millions of other people who is into different stuff than me.
Plus, I'm an asexual for humans and full non-animals. Stop forcing me to get something I can't compile too.

Unnamed-138 by Channeleven
Unnamed-139 by Channeleven
Again, you failed to understand the story behind that.
Plus not that I would censor this for those pictures directly (because of what's in there), but I should remind you that I am one of the guys who is trying to get you banned right?
Your bigotry reasoning is why I defend my so-called "faults".
Or maybe because you can't bare to be wrong?
"You are wrong because my opinion filled with holes said so!"
And they are not faults. Just because your bigotry mind said so, doesn't mean it is.
"CUZ I SAIDS SO!"
"wwwarea's are faults because I SDAIZ SO!!"
But I have a right to argue them, I have a right to defend, (And I never stalked them, but they did) and that article is my business. Yet, you check my blog every 24/7.
Yes, you could argue them, but the way you go about arguing only gives people more of a reason to hate you.
In other words, if I argue them, they will go after me.. And that somehow it's "not" their fault that they chose to stalk me, etc.
*sarcasm*
And you don't know what a special snowflake is.
A special snowflake is someone who embodies unusual concepts, (common with otherkin) and pretends they're unique because of it. Common on Tumblr, where you would honestly be better off on, everyone thinks like you there.
No it doesn't. Plus you are very unusual too.
Nobody is "one normal".
Also, you sound more like a snowflake because of the way you treat others because of who they are.
Plus, everyone is unique for who they are, and if that really means "special snowflake" then it's not even wrong, just a troll term made up to promote the delusion of "normal" (The illusion normal) when in reality, everyone is normal for who they are.

Also, if someone wants to believe they are another creature, there isn't anything wrong with that because it's not discriminating anyone for being themselves.
Actually you think the world is all about you REM. Face it, many people are not like you.

Yeah, which is why sites like Encyclopedia Dramatica exist to document those who function as poorly as you do.
Ignoring the point and of course, take such a troll site as a "real" thing. Most people talked about on their don't function poorly, and not me. You however...
I know plenty of people online is is far more smart than you, who is open, outside the "norm" and opens their mind more.

Question, do they have/defend fetishes, rely on science for guidance, get turned on by Alpha and Omega and refuse to ever admit when they're wrong?
Yes. Just like I do. (The main top part)
And look at you, talking about yet, another harmless thing.
You treating other people's alternatives as "wrong" shows why you are a bigot (According to the actual definitions).
Maybe you are wrong for being a common sexual then.
Face it REM, a lot of people are not like you.
I know they're not like me. A lot of people are unlikeable pricks like you, whereas I'm mentally sound.
Again folks, the bigot as he usually is.
 Stop calling your bigotry and prejudice "criticism".
It's like saying homophobia speech is "criticism" and it's not.

Remember that homosexual/heterosexual drinking game I hosted? It's back, with a new rule, now you must take a drink when he brings up hetero/homophobia.
Again, an immature prejudice bigot who can't even argue.

Face it, you just can't get twisted beliefs out of your system.
Ironic, coming from you.
Predicted, as usual.
Actually 'Intellectual Property' is proven to be an illusion.
Where? (preferably not from a source that caters to your damaged mind)
Maybe if you took actual criticism and followed the links instead of being like "OH NO, IT'S AGAINST MY BELIEFS, *IGNORES*" then you will see why.
The only damaged mind is yours.
Also I found this recently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO9FKQAxWZc
I've seen the actual criticism, it shows our full history, the fact that we never needed Copyright (Just look at history), the purpose of Copyright, and the fact that Copyright is NOT a human right; that it was only a monopoly law granted for a LIMITED amount of time, then the Public Domain.

So what you're saying is that everyone's allowed to take whatever they want? Ok, I'll take your stamps and claim them as my own.
Copyright has nothing to do with protecting credit.
There is a difference between copying and lying.

Nina Paley also knows this a lot.
Criticism it's self isn't fake, but the problem is that you abuse that term, and use it over something as a disguised to call it "criticism".

Coming from a guy who abuses the First Amendment and The Golden Rule.
I don't abuse the First Amendment, and I most definitely do not abuse The Golden Rule.
You don't treat others as respect as you. And if you won't do that, then people are going to go after you for starting it. (The Silver Rule?)
Bringing out problems that already violate the Golden Rule is called Justice.
You have to realize that even if your garbage "was" criticism, doesn't mean you are all of a sudden "right".
Plus it's like calling homophobia or heterophobia "criticism" then.
Take a drink. Also, you're not always right either.
Even if I wasn't right all the time, you are a lot more wrong. Plus you can't seem to prove how I am "wrong".
To actually criticized, you have to argue, use science, give out (optional) insightful articles, etc.
You cant do that, you ignore the articles for your own self centered comfort zone, etc.
And you always cry your eyes out when you see someone not you be themselves.

So if someone sets themselves up to get criticized, namely by posting there stuff where anyone could see it, we're not allowed to criticize it?
And if someone criticizes you "back" for being an asshole with the invalid "criticism card", you are allowed to abuse individuals?

*drinks*
And cry your eyes out whenever someone criticizes you for your bigotry behavior toward them, and act like it was never your fault when you started a fight with those people.
Once more, this applies more to you than to me. How the hell could you point out your own faults without realizing it so many times?
It depends. You are the only one at fault for many things.
I'm just trying to protect Freedom of Expression and exposing the corrupted beliefs that people use to violate Freedom of Expression.
Yes you do. You need to realize that not everyone is the same, that as long if they do not hurt anyone with their 'fetish', they are no better or worse than you with your type of sexuality.
That's right folks, he expects me to respect everyone who has a fetish.
This is why there will always be misanthropes (Not that it's bad to be one) and those who can't respect you for your common 'fetish' then.
If you respected personal opinion, you wouldn't attack them for coming out of the closet just because you don't like it, or what other people think around them.
Right, because god forbid I hurt their little feelings.
And god forbid someone hurts your feelings back with your crap and assholes.
That all depends buddy.
You are also comparing that with heterophobia who *thinks differently* than you.
Take a drink.
Again, a classic example of a person who just can't debate.
And yeah, having let's say a 'foot fetish' for women is obviously part of heterosexuality for some heterosexual people.
But you don't realize that most foot fetishists apply it to underaged cartoon characters and other questionable concepts. This guy, need I say more? Plus, regardless of where the fetish is applied, it could lead to something truly horrifying.
OH NO! A FICTION!! FUCK!!!! OH WELL, I ALSO GUESS FOOT FETISHES ARE BAD TO ALL NOW TOO. JUST LIKE HOW HETEROSEXUAL COMMONS RAPE PEOPLE.
*sarcasm*
Just like how heterosexuality common can lead to something horrifying too.
It's the "same", it's already proven to have similarities, and they all don't hurt people it's self.
Because homosexuals totally stomp on people's faces, lick their soles, fart on themselves and eat each other.
You clearly didn't understand why I quoted the word "same" right?
Plus it's a fantasy, there can be consenting, different universe rules (or maybe even in this one somehow), etc.
Regardless, expressing a tame down version is no more gross or extreme (in content) than kissing.
Also by the same, I'm talking about in comparison to sexual identity, that it's just another type of sexual style, etc.

Albeit, an unethical one.
"CUZ I SAIDZ SO!"
Well I'm not fucked up either.
Keep telling yourself that.
Stalk talking in the mirror.
Yes I mean crazy Sonic fan (sonicfag doesn't exist, it's made up by butthurt trolls or cyberbullies like you).
Really? A term meant to identify Sonic fans who've let their love of that hedgehog overcome them is fake? Something tells me you'd white knight everyone BLACKBusterCritic has covered in his series, Sonic Brain Fart. P.S., he coined the term. Why don't you send him a message (either on YouTube or Twitter) to give him a piece of your mind?
Again, just making up stuff over people not you. Using the wrong abused definition of "white knight", again, using the term "fag" over stuff you don't like.
If PaulandAmy harassed people then I'm not defending that, BUT people can forgive (like how people forgive mistakes) and defend around it on certain subjects that it's self isn't harassment.
That's right, wwwarea justified PaulandAmy's crime (rape), and implies that people should forgive the whole thing.
That's right. REM believe in revenge and completely slanders me saying that I defend the crime it's self.

He doesn't know that forgiving doesn't mean you are allowing the crime.
And there will always be people to stand up for themselves against bigotry that you call "criticism" too.
Question is though, will they prove to be mature and respectful individuals? Or would they go your route and cry while pretending they're getting attacked.
You calling your crap "criticism" out of bigotry, fear, etc. is a start of non-mature. Since you don't respect them in the first place.




I'm done right now.
Honestly, REM is very predictable, cannot argue, defends the same old shit "Fear, hypocrisy, bigotry, etc"

I'm going to make a general journal on him since the rest of his arguments cannot defend himself, and cannot argue.

He already lost.

And I might continue, but I doubt it.
------------------

End of Request..?
Apparently he told me he's going to make a journal about why Channeleven cannot debate or something.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

FunnelBigot


Note: This picture was uploaded after the main article was finished.

Of course, as expected, the stalker continues to check the blog right away.

I will still post the request, I still don't know about the taboo idea though.

Request Posted:

==========================

Note: Of course, within quote spacing: The deeper quote spacing is his, the main quote spacing without the bold is mine and the bold messages in the quote spacing is his again (But recent).
Note again: Some of my own quotes he posted within the quotes pacing may have some bold stuff too.
Also, the deeper quote spacing with bold words are most likely Funnel's too.

http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/wwwarea-A-Rebel-Without-a-Cause-569881032

With an untrue title. Like before.
 Well it seems that one cyberbully is still going for it, and this time has promoted yet, another slander against me.
funnelvortex.deviantart.com/jo…
I don't think it's as bad as the "Wants to kill people" or whatever that other journal said, but this.. really?

Well stop acting the way you do. The reason people say that stuff about you is because you act like a fucking psychopath.
I do not act like a fucking psychopath. Lot's of people who question popular beliefs are not psychopaths.
Oh the emotions of your bigotry cannot stand it.
Yet, regardless, you have no right to slander me.
It seems I was right that Funnel can't stand it when people has a different opinion on taboo subjects.

Let's show why Funnel is wrong. Again.

AKA proving yourself wrong. Again. 
 "Because I said so!"
Just because it's not words used together like that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

But it does show you do not know what it is actually called.
Yeah it's called disagreeing and giving criticism back.
The fact is that you are trying to throw excuses to make you think that what you say is "always" right when you're not.

I never said I was always right.
Yeah right.
That's not a valid argument.
And just because others feel annoyed doesn't mean I committed a guilty act.
Plus, you annoy me.

Well you have more haters than white knights. Oh what is the use of using statistics in my arguments if you are going to disregard it as "DEPENDING ON POPULARITY!!!!1!11!" anyways?

Statistics, whether you like it or not, is able to be used in a legitimate argument. 
*Drinks* <The 'depend on popularity' beer
And how do you know that?
Because depending what other people FEEL about me is NOT a valid excuse to argue that I'm "guilty".

No it's not. Kissing in movies has annoyed a lot of people off, does that make it wrong?
You are the one looping in a circle forcing me to repeat myself.
Umm I'm actually not. You are the one repeating the same exact thing based off your overly emotional popularity bullshit.
I should say the same with your sonic OC stuff then.

Fair enough. But we can still think A&O is creepy. And there have been a few creepy Sonic moments actually. But at least Sonic had some actual quality during the 2000's before this Boom shit happened.

Alpha and Omega had hardly any quality to begin with.
And Sonic never had quality to begin with then.
Yet, you are wrong (Because again, you force your hate at me for expressing my own likes for a picture), it had enough quality for a general amount of people.
So lack of evidence (to you) that it's not me all of a sudden makes it me now?Well it is pretty obvious. That is the thing about sock accounts, they are painfully obvious and not too hard to figure out. And I have seen a lot of socks in my days.
Just because you think it's "obvious" doesn't mean you are right.
Sock accounts?
And your past doesn't connect to this.
Trust me buddy, their are plenty of people who will talk like me.

Yeah, on Tumblr. Which would be the perfect site for you!
Actually, why won't you just move to Tumblr? You would be at home with all the other SJWs, Otherkin, and special snowflakes who run rampant on that site.
 Oh stop being a baby. Maybe SOME Tumblr stuff is right then? Such as the 'Be yourself' stuff, etc.
Stop being a fucking dick, you fucking asshole.

Maybe you should move their for your shitty Sonic OC garbage then.
And for your shitty spiritual beliefs then, etc.
Yet that guy talks a little different on here.

Oh rly?
Stop talking like a 13 year old.
He said nothing about you for months
Peter?
Pfft, bullshit.

He tried, but then you kept on spouting your bullshit.
Again, making up excuses for him to start fights with me.
I'm not making up bullshit, and he has no right to stalk me just because you and him finds a standing up for themselves person's speech "bullshit".
 Still assumption.
Plus you blocked me for disagreeing with you on some Sonic.EXE thing I barely even cared about personally.

No, it was because you were spamming me over and over. And if you didn't care why did you make a pro-Sonic.exe stamp?
 All I did was posted another comment complaining about you censoring me.
And because of you, censoring me and the topics around the game which caught my interest.
I do, but it's personal.

What is it then? A Walmart job?
Are you saying it's bad to get that? And no I don't have that.
If it acts like bullying, then it is.
And I know a certain guy you like as a friend (..I think) that uses the word "faggot" in some style against me. Just saying.When?
If it's stalking, and forcing people to change without consent, then that's bullying.
 One, assumptions are not considered good value to use as an argument.
Two, I don't think your reply is making sense.

Educated assumptions are.
"educated assumption"?
*Facepalm*
This is why I LOVE to question taboos. I love having a more debatable scientific debate who questions the overly emotional people like you who can't learn to open his/her mind on debates and gets all emotionally upset.

Also, no it doesn't. This doesn't cause ANY stereotype. It's just some furry who has an opinion. It's not saying all furries think that it defends what you think is 'sick' without evidence, it's just some dude who's furry who has an opinion. And I believe it's a far better and open researched opinion.
It's pathetic of you to depend on who without learning how to argue directly.
But of course! You can't (Just as I predicted), and of course you not only act like I'm bad for linking to a research article as one of those guys who question taboos (I ALSO question other taboos.)You sound like a rebel without a cause. Someone who goes against taboos for the hell of going against taboos. Going against what society does not accept makes you feel like some progressive revolutionary, when in reality you are someone who has no life and is longing for some sense of importance.
Umm what? I go against them because an overly emotional society doing that to subjects promotes harm, and more discrimination, and other bullshit. That's a reason why I love to question taboos.
Plus the fun of exposing how stupid humanity in general has gotten.

Actually it does? Because of the reasons.
Stop dictating other people not you.
I am for revolutionary (Hmm, I wonder where you hea... eh, nvm). I believe we should address the overly emotional things that lacks any scientific result to keep something 'forbidden'.
Here is me, and other people:
"Wow, I didn't know about that, I should learn more about this more scientifically, society could be wrong, the arguments are actually something I never heard before and seems like it was lost and hidden, and I find this a bit interesting as a person who wonders the random auto emotions of the world.. I didn't know that!"

If it sounds too incredible to be true then it probably isn't.
What? Face it, the research was very much better than overly emotional people who censors the scientific results, the open mind, the curiosity, and some other and freaks out over open discussion, etc.
And "probably" is just your emotional opinion without any real concrete evidence as usual.

Then here is you:
"OMG, IT'S ITZZ... DEFENDING A TABOO!!!! FUCK SCIENCE, FUCK OPEN RESEARCH, IT'S OFFCIAL GUYZ HE'S DEFENDING SOMETHING WE THINK IS ALL WRONG JUST BECAUSz it violatzes realiguoz believfz, they don't consrnt!! Lalalalalalal screw the evidnece of the consenting debates, screw it all, also, screw the fact that humans were forced (other way around?) by animalz themzelsf! Screw that, it's  still somehow humzn raping them!!!
Also, fuck that, animalz don'tz consnzt to being killzez!"It doesn't matter if animals can "consent", they do not know they are being porked by some perverted human. They do not even understand the emotional aspect of sex. It is basically rape.
Again, an overly emotional feeling.
Plus, consenting is the only moral thing.
Rape is unwanted sex. Plus, I am pretty sure they know what is happening. Plus the term "perverted" is just an opinion.
I can find a VERY good article to show why the arguments are wrong, because I believed it addressed many things, but alas, what's the point? You won't read it.

Plus, do animals consent to being killed?
Do animals know why people 'owned them'.
Do animals consent to being trapped in a house?
Do animals consent to being used for meat?
Do animals consent to being moved to other places by forced?
Honestly Funnel, I was just curious mainly about this subject and wanted to be open about the debates and that and I found a very good argument that consent could exist or not.
And the truth is, their is evidence (ACCORDING to the research I've done) to the point that the other way around can happen. I prefer that instead because I believe it's superior to people who argue out of their own feelings (or religious beliefs).I am arguing out of rationality.
Umm, no, I'm not.
Let me give you an example: In the report, if a human didn't do a thing and the other did it, how did the human "raped" it?
I know it sounds like I am one of those guys by some, but I'm still on this subject because of me being very angered with stupidity.
Honestly as a person who has a different opinion and is more open who question taboos (That's often what I like doing, just like some other people), I found it interesting. Yet, I also do believe discrimination is sick too.
The problem (As a taboo question person) is that society often claims many things without evidence out of their emotions.
And as a person who question why things are taboos, I do not find it a really good source of information and I consider it biases, and prejudice instead.
That's why I thought the article was pretty great, it was open minded research, not covered and riddle by non-scientific emotions, and other bullshit.
Hell, another interesting thing is this: "Animals can't consent to being killed."
I believe that is a VERY good point. But of course, like the closed minded loony you are, you can't respect those who question our own unscientific beliefs.

Sounds like you could be a member of PETA. Seriously, 100% of PETA are people who freak out and throw ragefits over people doing things they do not like.
 Killing an animal is wrong though. PETA being against that it's self is a good thing, though at the same time PETA kills animals too. So nope!
And you know what else people freak out over of things they do not like?
Humans murdering other humans, abusing animals, etc.
Hell, it's not just that taboo. I do this for many other things that could be taboo.
Like Polygamy, or why people freak out involving humans and animals (idk, something about human skin on a book?), and others.There is a reason why taboo exists.
It is because history has shown time to time again, when things like incest, pedophilia, polygamy, etc start to become acceptable, it usually is a sign that society is about to go downhill or collapse. *cough*Roman Empire*cough*
No healthy society has any of that shit in it. You only see that when society was in a deep rut. And it only became acceptable because they needed to keep the gene pool going, the women would often die on childbirth, people wouldn't live as long, they needed extra children, etc.

This is why homosexuality was seen as bad for a long time as well. Homosexuality was considered bad and these taboos were accepted because they needed to mass produce offspring to repopulate Europe, especially in the dark ages and middle ages where diseases like the plague ran rampant.

But guess what? It is 2015 and society is way past that. No longer do we need to crank out 1000 babies per minute.
It's an overly emotional reason filled with prejudice, bigotry, and other hate. That's it.
Actually a healthy society wouldn't make things taboo. And wow, you don't even believe in Polygamy rights either? WTF.
 Again, your reasoning is bullshit. Just because things are considered "downhill" doesn't mean it's a good reason to keep things a taboo.
Again, your reasoning for that is based off prejudice, and bigotry, and other hate.
You also want to know something? It's been viewed on homosexuality too in the same exact way.

And we need to make other things less taboo too.
It's not over you know.

There is still problems with bigots who is against consenting things such as Polygamy and a few other things, etc.
A good an developing society wouldn't forbid freedom within individual privacy.

In the end, this is why I question taboos, and why I think making stuff a taboo is just wrong.
The reasoning why stuff is taboo is all based off prejudice and random other beliefs.
Your explanation didn't explain why they were taboo in the first place.
Actually one time a class told that having any "fetish" was a "disorder" but that was changed.
Personality never changes. You can't change who you are, and there are evidence that it becomes part of you. Just like how you grow up deeply with a 'fetish' like vore.
Not everyone will change that, unless it's one of those barely into things and was a side but not to the great.. or one of those 'sex' shifting things to another. (Or that's the same thing)

Actually, you can change who you are and you can change your personality. This is how rehabilitation (for criminals, addicts, etc) and treatment for anger issues and things like that work.
Umm, no.
You are confusing action with personality.
Having a vore identity for your main orientation is not the same thing as taking an action.
Who said so? Your 'God'? Your "normal" religion?

I never said I was a Christian. Actually, I am not a Christian, and I have already explained that I wasn't.
Christianity isn't the only God worshipping. (Or your personal made up opinion God)
Plus, it was a part guess. Don't forget about your own "normal" religion.
Face it, there isn't. That's just some made up term to force your shitty bigotry on other people.
You are making up something to cause you to not respect others who likes to personally cross your imaginary line.The line is not imaginary in that sense. 
It is. Just because you said so, doesn't mean it exist on people not you.
Yes it does. It always applies. Who the hell said it didn't? It's ALWAYS something you need to follow according to it.
Also, they already violated the Golden Rule by robbing. Stopping them to protect it is probably justice anyway.

That is the thing about the Golden Rule. It can be molded like Play Dough to apply to anything. 
The Golden Rule is about not interfering with other people. Following that is always a must.
No I rant over actual issues. Either way, everyone has them!

But not all of them are good (e.g. Your crap).

You rant over things because you want to be some sort of "revolutionary" for no purpose other than to feel important. 
No I do so for the sake of protecting freedom, etc.
The Easter Bunny exist then!!!

So believing in moral tolerance is like believing the Easter Bunny! 
A moral tolerance is about accepting those for who they are and what they personally like to express.
Just because a popular cult believes that it's "not normal" doesn't mean it exist.
That's like saying a certain other fictional character exist on this world because many kids believe so.

How is kissing the same as stomping and inflation? 
 Not the same style of sexuality, but it's a tamed down style just like kissing.
And that not everyone wants to see either.
They are the same in terms of different types of sexuality.

The only catch I like to say is that it also depends on them.
Kissing can get to very extreme cases where it wouldn't be appropriate under a certain rating (E.g. PG) and kissing can be very tamed down (E.g. Kissing on the cheek) that it doesn't violate it.

Kissing is two humans kissing. Inflation is making a woman fatter than Jabba The Hutt's mother and calling it "sexy", often by means of force feeding. And also having that much fat isn't fucking healthy!
 But it doesn't violate the PG thing, and yet, that's just your opinion. It's still a tamed down thing like kissing. And guess what? It is sexy for those who likes it. It's not your sexuality.
Also kissing can apply to anthropomorphic creatures too.
Vore for example has the same story. A vore can be very extreme that it past the rating (E.g. PG) but it can be tamed down to the point that it's just as tamed down as kissing on the cheek.
Hell, you even sometimes see 'vore' on TV. Though these on the Internet may have a different likes but that doesn't make it extreme.Vore in cartoons is meant to be a gag, but all the vore on the Internet is obviously sexualized. And to anyone who does not have the fetish, it is going to look weird. And they are going to find it gross. 
Whatever you say. You don't know that..
Same with kissing. Yet, just because it's 'sexualized', still doesn't change the content it's self. It's just an erotic tamed down kissing style then when it comes to tamed down versions.
And some people will find kissing gross.
But just because some people find it gross, doesn't mean it's more extreme than kissing all of a sudden.

If you say it's "more gross" then KISSING is more gross than what I like then.
Just because it's considered a "fetish" (A stupid term) or something some people don't like (Just like kissing) doesn't mean it's more extreme in general.

Hahaha, riiiiight. So stomping someone, giving them so much fat that they will die from a heart attack, or tying them up and holding them hostage is the same as kissing!
It's a fantasy. That's different.
Plus, I'm talking about the content it's self.
My point is that in terms of 'what is"gross", a tamed down vore is no more extreme than kissing.
The IDEA for them may be different, but it's still not more extreme than seeing too people kiss.
Stop blaming what I do for their crimes.
It's their fault.
You remind me of a 14 year old who says "It's you're fault you got me banned!!"
(learned from a stamp)

Um what? It is your fault that you react this way.
No, it's the trolls and other types of cyberbullies fault that act that way to me, causing me to be concerned about them.
What I did wasn't even against the rules at least mostly (In case. lol), or something serious like slander, start fights with people, or maybe less serious like lie about deals.Except you did do it.
Making a journal against me for expressing a natural open minded thing about spirituality starts a fight. And that's just one of many examples as to why you start fights.
If that was true, I would make pointless rants about stuff like Angry Birds, people personally liking what I hate, and some more.
Because maybe the world isn't so great yet.And yet you did this with Alpha and Omega
I didn't make a rant against Alpha and Omega.
I made a rant to what is important for me to be happy in my own life, by bringing out the unfair arguments based off personality.


Oh shut it with the "IT HAZ 2 B 4 MUNEYZ" thing. I am sick and tired of repeating myself because you keep insisting the same thing over and over! There are different types of blackmailing! 
 And I am sick and tired repeating myself based off reading an actual law.
You are the one repeating yourself in the bad way.
Why?
Because you always fail to give me proof.
Give me a fucking law link telling me that it's illegal to do so in general then.
Go on, give me one!
No link? Then stop repeating something that is least likely to be true then.

Just because I am not spamming links to random sites doesn't mean I am wrong!
And yeah, blackmail is an illegal thing in any form.
Umm so me giving you the correct link over and over again that still further debunks you makes it "wrong" all of a sudden now?
Plus, you spam that I "broke" the law without proof.

Nope, not an illegal form.
Proof or its bullshit.
Again, picking a fight. And yes it's a spiritual belief. Get over it.
If it involves the spiritual world, soul, etc. Then it counts.

And it also involves thinking the world revolves around you.
Just because it's different, doesn't mean it's wrong.
It doesn't need to be, people can have different ideas and beliefs under spirituality and it doesn't matter how many people think differently.
Oh yeah. *drinks*
Also, you don't have proof that it's "bad".
Yet, a special snowflake is a person who thinks they are morally special than anyone else, but no.
We all have spiritual beliefs, we all have a personality, and this is just one of mine, like anyone else.Yours consists of victim blaming and self-centered ideals. You believe that the world is created with our minds and that everything and most people around you are a creation of yours. And this pretty much means that the world revolves around you, you are the center of anything, and you can do whatever you want. Pretty shitty ideals if you ask me.

People also seem to believe in this despite evidence for the Big Bang, which includes the cosmic background radiation. So yes, the Big Bang made the universe and not our minds.
I am a victim though, and that you victim blame me and other is just wrong. It's not 'self-centered'.
That's the theory though. Just because you think it's "shitty" doesn't mean it is.
It's just an experiment. Maybe everyone in the world creates it at the same time.
Maybe you are in a dream creating it.
Or maybe everyone creates their own and each time they go, they go in a parallel universe creating other events, while I go to mine, creating more.

But the 'Big Bang' is still just a theory.
Or.. maybe the mind created the Big Bang!
Believe it or not, but even that can be a possibility. That our minds created our own history.
It may sound ridiculous to some, but that's what the theory is.
Beliefs create reality.
In the end, you just attack people for their spiritual belief and you have no right to do that.

And if it is teaching something harmful and needs to be called out?
It's not harmful.
If it "is" because of your fear, then your spirituality is harmful then.
Otherwise, you don't have real spiritual beliefs then and you are bad for them now.

And what if I pulled something out of my ass one day like the Sonic Cult I talked about that one other time? Does that count as legit? Thinking that you are the reincarnations of Sonic characters and that salvation will be through the chaos emeralds that you and your cult needs to find?

Does a cult based around Sonic sound like a legitimate spirituality to you?

SONIC. CULT.
It depends though, and it's not exactly "pulled out of ass", if it connects with possible legit theories (I.e. Attached with spiritual world creation, dreams in realities, mind over matter, etc) then it's less of an "ass" thing.

It can be if they have that attachment. According to what connects.
You can have a fucking "stupid" Angry Birds cult and have some belief about it like that, and I don't fucking care.. like how a good person who tries to move on would do.

Yet, if you believe you can turn into anything AFTER death, I see that even less crazy. And since it's not crazy to believe in reincarnations.

What if those people are potential dangers to society??? 
 A risk doesn't mean it crosses your imaginary line.
Yet, everything has a risk. That's just how it works.
So according to your imagination, everything we do crosses this 'line'.

So what PaulAndAmy did, obsess over Amy, was okay. Except for one thing, his thing for Amy went out of control and he raped little girls!

Potential threats are potential threats
OH NO! That means everyone else who likes Amy so much is automatically going to do the same thing!!!
*sarcasm*
You also want to know something?
Someone who was a heterosexual couldn't control his/her sexuality and raped someone in a house.

Potential threats are potential threats! :D

Plus in reality, it's not a 'potential' threat because it's not going to develop that for everyone else who loves Amy so much.
You are the one who freaked out over A&O
 A little more clear please?
Plus, their is a difference between liking/disliking than making claims off of it.
wwwarea.deviantart.com/art/Res…

One of your stamps.
Depending on who eh?
Plus, look at all the feedback.
More people are laughing at you right now
Only by bigots like you!
Real people are probably laughing at you for your imaginary line.
You are basically like "No it's not!" *Lalala*

Real people? REAL PEOPLE!? What the heck?
I probably meant better people.
 Are you talking about the time I would 'threat' to show a picture (or describe the house)?

Yes
If so, then I think you misread it. It was either talking about showing a picture (without the address) or describing how it looks (without the address).So you admit it.
But you said I threat to show the ADDRESS.
*Facepalm extreme*
Again, you hid it because you couldn't stand me who disagreed with it. I was just trying to be reasonable and try to argue.
You hid it because you don't like it when someone disagrees with you.
And I kinda freaked out because I figured you didn't support Freedom of Speech.

After you blocked me, I made a stamp of my own because I was offended that I couldn't speak my say.

You said you did not care about Sonic.exe yet you were OFFENDED! How sensitive are you? 
I was offended because of your unfair censorship and with the reasoning around that game.
You never said it that way. You just said you need money to own have Copyright.
Sounds like a waste of money.

Actually considering how much you can copyright for 35 bucks it's money well spent! That is unless you do not have 35 bucks to go around to spend once in your life, who I then can only assume has no job.
More like throwing away 35 bucks when I can just use a Creative Commons for free (maybe) to stop plagiarism.
I also requested Imgur to take down a Copyright picture (Without money) and they took it down.
Maybe I'll ask DA if I need money to take action with a DMCA.
Besides, Creative Commons is a great tool (and it's free I think) to stop plagiarism. Well the 'NC and ND' are the crappy licenses, but others are fine. :D

Creative Commons actually makes your work open source.
No. CC-0 does.
But Creative Commons main purpose is attribution.
Sounds like somebody doesn't know what Creative Commons is.
I question you if you think the system is perfect. Because it's not.
Yet, it's been criticized with interesting information.
wwwarea.deviantart.com/art/IP-…

Your stamp?
And you do not want human rights, Area, you want anarchy. 
A stamp that has many links leading to articles. Yet, I am a person that counts.
Copyright is not a human right.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121019/12333120767/no-copyright-is-not-human-right.shtml





I have every reason to complain about Copyright. Especially it's myths around it.
Copyright is a monopoly. It prevents some creativity (stifles creativity), and the extensions are very ridiculous.
Copyright is NOT a human right (I already shown a link in area talking about that from a stamp), and it's been causing other problems.

For the sake of being against plagiarism, Copyright is not an answer and wasn't even designed to stop that originally.

Copyright doesn't prevent you from using ideas. It only stops you from using the work yourself. Ideas can not be copyrighted, so I have no idea why you are complaining.
I know you can't Copyright an idea (Though it's been argued that expression and ideas are the same) but it's still a monopoly, preventing people from using an existing thing to create more off of. It's also a monopoly preventing people to openly share.
Also, it's still considered (By man-made law) 'Copyright Infringement' to recreate something Copyrighted or to recreate something Copyrighted and use it for a later purpose.

Example: You are still not allowed to draw Mickey Mouse and make up your own story without monopoly permission.
EVEN if you give credit.

That stifles creativity and prevents Freedom of Expression.

-------------
Another thing about this article that owned Funnel, is that the person ignored the 'popularity' spelling part, and other parts.
:)

END

==========================

End of Request